|
Scripture vs. the Spiritual
Gifts?
by Elliot Miller
Scripture vs. the spiritual gifts? The very idea
is self-contradictory, since God is the source of both. And yet, this
contradiction has been a lamentable reality in the twentieth-century
church. More often than not, the Bible and the "charismata"
(gifts of God's grace) have been set at odds, with one being made the
reason for ignoring (if not rejecting) the other.
At the bottom, of this conflict is a crucial
issue for the Christian faith — revelation. Although the
anticharismatics (e.g., many dispensational and reformed believers)
would agree that some spiritual gifts are functioning today, they
often argue that the more dramatic "sign" gifts (e.g.,
prophecy, speaking in tongues, healing, miracles — see 1 Cor.
12:8-10) served special authenticating and revelatory functions in the
first century only. Basing their position largely on Corinthians
13:8-12, they maintain that once the canon or Scripture ("that
which is perfect") was completed, the sign gifts with their
"partial" revelation were no longer needed and so ceased to
exist. Thus, the anticharismatics view the modem charismatic movement
as being unbiblical and in direct competition with biblical
revelation, allowing extrabiblical "messages from God" to
supersede Scripture.
A survey of the twentieth-century
pentecostal/charismatic movement would seem to vindicate such charges.
Although there are notable exceptions (e.g., the Assemblies of God),
charismatics seem to have a propensity for novel and controversial
doctrines (e.g., "manifest sons of God," demonization of
Christians, "shepherding," "positive confession,"
"kingdom now"). In fact, there is a prevailing tendency
among charismatics to view the charismata as a source of continuing
revelation. Some formally affirm this belief (see, e.g., "The
Gospel According to Paulk" on p.21). But even among those who
would not consciously embrace it, it is not uncommon to find the sign
gifts functioning as revelation in their lives. For examples:
doctrines are accepted as biblical mainly because they received a
"prophetic" endorsement; church and personal decisions are
more often based on prophetic "words" than Scripture;
supernatural manifestations are pursued with greater zeal than
understanding of Scripture and sound doctrine.
The conflict of "Scripture vs. the
spiritual gifts," then, might be restated as a conflict over
whether extrabiblical revelation, in the form of the sign gifts, is
biblical. But this brings us right to the root of the problem. Both
sides of the debate have a mistaken view of the biblical purpose and
function of the sign gifts. And worse, the charismatic side has a
deficient appreciation of biblical revelation.
In the sense of the term used here, a revelation
is God's authoritative disclosure to man of universally significant
truth. God's revelation in Christ, as recorded in Scripture, is final
and complete (Heb. 1:1-2; Jude 3; Eph. 2:20; etc.). As God's unique
and infallible word, Scripture is sufficient for all our doctrine, and
is the absolute standard by which we must judge all things (2 Tim. 3:1
5-1 7; Isa. 8:20).
Biblically, the sign gifts serve distinctly
different, nonrevelatory purposes. Space will not permit an analysis
of each sign gift to prove this point. But if it can be established in
regard to prophecy, it would seem obvious that the others are
nonrevelatory as well.
Because it does consist of messages from God to
man, prophecy could have conceivably substituted for Scripture until
the canon was complete. But is that what 1 Corinthians 13 is saying?
Historically, the church has understood this passage to mean by
"that which is perfect" the Second Coming of Christ.
Dispensationalist argue, though, that the Greek word for
"perfect" (Teleion) is in the neuter gender, indicating the
apostle meant Scripture rather than Christ. However, the Greek can as
easily mean "mature" or "complete," and it would
appear from the context that Paul uses the neuter gender because he is
writing about particular states or levels of maturity (cf. v. 11). In
our future, "mature" or "perfect" state, after we
are glorified at Christ's second coming, we will no longer need the
gifts God has given us to help us get by in our present feeble
condition. We will then "see face to face" and "know
fully" (v. 12; cf. 1 John 3:2).
If the anticharismatics are wrong, and prophecy
(understood as messages from, God to man) is meant to continue, does
that mean those charismatics who believe in ongoing revelation are
right? While prophecy was an important means of revelation in biblical
times, the "prophecy" referred to as a spiritual gift given
to the church in 1 Corinthians is manifestly of a different kind. This
is evidenced by Paul's instruction: "For you can all prophesy one
by one, so that all may learn and all be exhorted" (14:31).
Certainly, all of the Corinthians were not capable of transmitting
authoritative revelation comparable to that of Paul, Peter, and John!
The charisma of prophecy does not impart some
previously undisclosed doctrinal truth, nor does it carry the
authority of revelation. Each new manifestation is to be rigorously
tested (1 Cor. 14:29; 1 Thess. 5:20-21), suggesting that those who
exercise it are not expected to be infallible (as were the Old
Testament prophets - Deut. 18:20-22).
What then is its function? While it may
occasionally impart nondoctrinal knowledge of local significance
(e.g., Acts 11:27-28), it primarily applies the already-revealed truth
of Scripture to the church's present situation for purposes of
"edification and exhortation and consolation" (1 Cor. 14:3).
Like all of the other gifts, it is a means of ministry, not
revelation.
In this sense, prophecy, tongues, and healing
are no different than teaching, mercy- showing, and service (Rom.
12:7-8). Just as the latter gifts complement the ministry of the Word,
so should the former. They are not meant to compete with Scripture
(God's unique revelation) for the central place of authority and
guidance in our lives. But, in the context of Christ's body, they each
provide a special ministry of grace which the believer needs to
"grow up in all aspects into Him, who is the head, even
Christ" (Eph. 4:15).
CRI, P.O. Box 7000, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
92688 Phone (949) 858-6100 and Fax (949) 858-6111
|