|
Eastern Orthodoxy A
Summary Critique: Dancing Alone
by Ralph E. MacKenzie
Eastern Orthodoxy has over 255 million adherents
worldwide, with over five million of these residing in America. Roman
Catholics and Protestants are so accustomed to viewing Christianity
through a Western (Latin) prism that they forget that their faith
began and first developed in the East. An Eastern Christian, Ananias
from Damascus, Syria, baptized the apostle Paul (Acts 9:1-19).
Followers of Christ were first called Christians at Antioch (Acts
11:19-26).
Even in the Western church during the early
years, theological leaders often originated from the
"Romanized" East — including Tertullian, Cyprian, and
Augustine. Indeed, of the five patriarchies (ecclesiastical
jurisdictions) that emerged in the early church — Rome, Alexandria,
Antioch, Constantinople, and Jerusalem — only Rome was in the West.
The church was Hellenized (influenced by Greek culture) before it was
Latinized.
All Orthodox Christians are informed by the
theological formulations that proceeded from the first seven general
councils. Indeed, "all profess that there are seven holy and
Ecumenical Councils, and these are the seven pillars of the faith of
the Divine Word"1 Therefore, Eastern Orthodoxy is often referred
to as "the Church of the Seven Councils."2
During the past two decades, the evangelical
wing of the church has experienced a number of defections. Although
most have joined the Roman Catholic church, not all of the Converts
traveled to Rome; some have found their way to Constantinople.
A group of evangelicals converted to Orthodoxy
in the mid-1970s, and the most visible among them has proven to be
Peter Gillquist.3 Gillquist is quite articulate and spends a great
deal of time in evangelical venues preaching the advantages of his new
ecclesiastical home. However a new convert to Orthodoxy has surfaced,
and he is not quite as restrained or irenic as Bishop Giliquist. His
name is Frank Schaeffer.
Frank Schaeffer (or "Franky," as he
was known before he became Orthodox) is the son of the late
evangelical Presbyterian scholar, Francis Schaeffer. After coming to
faith in Christ, the elder Schaeffer studied first at Westminster
Theological Seminary and then at Faith Theological Seminary. In 1948,
he and his wife Edith moved to Switzerland where he "founded
L'Abri, an international study center and caring community in the
Swiss Alps, where he offered an analysis of modern man's thought and a
critique of secular culture from a Christian perspective."4 The
L'Abri ministry was extended by Schaeffer's writings and many young
people came to faith through its outreach.
His son, Frank Schaeffer, is a filmmaker and
has been very vocal in his criticism of the cultural decline in our
society. In his book Dancing Alone, he explores the reasons for his
conversion to Orthodoxy.
The book is 327 pages in length and has a
foreword written by Bishop Methodios of the Greek Orthodox Diocese of
Boston. In the "author's note of acknowledgment," Schaeffer
writes, "I am a novelist and film director, not a historian or
theologian. I have no research staff. I am not a scholar" (p.
xiii). This will become painfully clear to anyone who can patiently
plow through this volume.
Schaeffer establishes the thesis of his book in
the introduction: "The more I read, the more I realized that I
had not been introduced to the historical Christian Church…"
Further, "I found that I had spent half a lifetime in the
Evangelical Protestant world without learning one iota about the
oldest things." Now come on. Frank's early Reformed environment
was not completely lacking in historical perspective. The muffled
noise you hear is Francis Schaeffer turning over in his grave.
Part One, "The Age of False Religion,"
primarily deals in its 12 chapters with the moral and spiritual
declension that has affected American culture. Schaeffer sees within
evangelicalism (as well as within the mainline denominations) an
apathy and permissiveness toward secularism and moral relativism.
Moreover, according to Schaeffer, the root cause of the debasement of
American culture is "the dreadful mixture of dehistoricalized
Evangelical Protestantism, Enlightenment Secularism and secularized,
American-style Roman Catholicism that has become our nation's civil
religion" (10). This disjointed theme appears early in the book
and recurs throughout.
At least Protestants are not the only ones to
blame for this sorry mess; Schaeffer indeed paints with a broad brush:
"Tragically, the American Roman Catholic Church has also become
almost as trivialized as its Protestant counterpart" (51).
Concerning Thomas Howard's book, Evangelical Is Not Enough, Schaeffer
comments: "Sadly Howard, who converted to the Roman Catholic
Church, is describing a liturgy that no longer exists in modernized
Roman Catholism"(sic). Nonetheless, Schaeffer reserves a special
place of contempt for his former evangelical environment.
Chapters One through Four deal with culture-war
subjects such as feminism, speciesism, and secularism. In Chapter Five
we come to what is for Schaeffer the centerpiece of his thesis: the
Western church's complete misunderstanding of the nature, theology,
liturgy and mission of biblical Christianity — Protestantism
(evangelicalism/fundamentalism, as well as the mainline churches) and
Roman Catholicism included. He begins with a fairly accurate
description of the cultural and historical elements that led to the
first fissure in Christendom, the East/West Schism.
Now Schaeffer moves to the crucial point:
"It seems to me that at the heart of the growing apart lay two
different visions of Christianity or even of God, differences which
persist to this day" (64). Translation: The Western church has a
faulty understanding of God.
The major reason for this misunderstanding was
that "the Roman Church in the West was dominated by the theology
of St. Augustine..." (64). This will come as a shock to
traditional Roman Catholics and evangelicals who equally honor the
Augustinian tradition as an accurate representation of the apostle
Paul's writings. Schaeffer's criticisms of Augustinianism (and later
the theology of Anselm and Thomas Aquinas) are repeated throughout the
remainder of the book — in the body of the text and the footnotes as
well.
Continuing his appraisal of the Bishop of Hippo,
Schaeffer affirms that "St. Augustine's own writings tend to
contradict his later works" (65). Augustine's theology
"became a rationalistic system of belief that, building on
certain isolated elements of St Paul's writings, and the influences of
pagan philosophy, evolved into a rationalistic dualism — a closed
system of theology — stripped of mystery and awe" (65). How
anyone who has even a casual acquaintance with the writings of this
spiritual giant (Confessions, The City of God) could say such a thing
is beyond this reviewer's comprehension.
Schaeffer piles misunderstanding upon
distortion: "Augustinianism teaches that so-called original sin
has stripped people of their intrinsic value..." Further, in
Schaeffer's understanding of Augustine, the grace God extends to man
"is not chosen by the sinner, but conferred upon him by God
regardless of the sinner's wishes" (66).
The Augustinian monk from Erfurt, Germany is
next up for derision: "The Lutheran position is straightforward.
It degrades man to the level of a beast; it contradicts Holy Tradition
and Scripture and flies in the face of human experience, which is
faced everyday with choices between good and evil" (67). It gets
worse as he reverts to the theme of Augustinianism: "In the
Augustinian West a vision of a juridical, vengeful capricious
god-devil emerged" with results ranging from "the
dictatorial corruptions of the papacy, to the cruelties of Calvin's
theocratic Geneva, to the evils of Calvinist-inspired South African
apartheid" (72).
John Calvin and his activities at Geneva spur
Schaeffer to new heights of vitriol. Calvin is accused of all sorts of
cruel and unseemly behavior (82-86). Calvin's policies at Geneva
"paralleled the worst of the papal pronouncements from Rome"
(85). Linkage between Augustine (who, according to Schaeffer, is the
root problem) and Calvin is made: "The Western Church's most
problematic Father soon became the Calvinists' one link with the
Christian past" (86). As a caricaturist of Augustinian/Calvinist
thought, Schaeffer has no equal.
The focus shifts to the American scene in
Chapter Seven. Calvinism surfaces as "Puritanism." The end
result in the United States is that "Martin Luther's, John
Calvin's, Jean Jacques Rousseau's and Thomas Jefferson's utopian,
deterministic, religiously secularized great-grand children are alive
and well" (101). Chapters Eight through Twelve continue
Schaeffer's examination of the affect that this Western theological
distortion had on the American experience.
Part Two, "Authentic Orthodox Faith,"
develops Schaeffer's understanding of the antidote to our cultural
ills: Eastern Orthodoxy. Issues such as the male hierarchy, order in
the church, apostolic continuity, and the delusion of "reducing
faith to an individualized experience" (192) are examined. The
remainder of the book is difficult to systematically critique because
of its rambling style and mixing of cultural and theological elements.
In the final chapter we find Schaeffer taking
his newly discovered ecclesiastical home to task: "Since becoming
Orthodox I have not discovered 'perfection' in the Church" (297).
Indeed, "the Protestantizing of Orthodoxy, while not as advanced
as the near-total Protestantizing of the American Roman Catholic
Church, nevertheless has resulted in various un-Orthodox forms of
thought and behavior" (298). Additionally, the ethnicity and
apathy of many Orthodox churches is challenged, and the seductive
affect that the ecumenical movement has had on Orthodoxy is lamented.
While other converts from evangelical
backgrounds (such as Thomas Howard to Roman Catholicism and Peter
Gillquist to Orthodoxy) often speak fondly of their former spiritual
homes, Frank Schaeffer takes great pains to distance himself from his
evangelical roots, His father, Francis Schaeffer, is mentioned only
once — without comment — in note 5, p. 15. Also, the bibliography
lists only one of his father's many books.
The author's tone in this book is so strident
and his historical perspective so distorted that this reviewer is
hard-pressed to make any positive comments. Fortunately, this is not
the last word from the Orthodox perspective.
Although there are significant differences
between Eastern and Western theological models,5 Schaeffer's severe
criticisms are by no means shared by all Orthodox scholars. For
example, Metropolitan Anthony of the Russian Orthodox Church in
England became the Chairman of the Trustees of the C. S. Lewis Centre
in London, He assumed this position because of "his conviction
that despite the divorce of East and West...historic orthodoxy is
still there as a sweet savor...."6 Metropolitan Anthony seems to
have no difficulty fellowshipping with "Western" Christians.
Consider also the following: "As the late
Georges Florovsky said, when queried why he, as an Eastern Orthodox
refugee from both Communism and Nazism, would turn up in an
evangelical, even fundamentalistic circle, "The Christian is
never a stranger where our blessed Lord is loved and worshipped."
NOTES
1 John II, Metropolitan of Russia (AD.
1080-1089). Quoted in Timothy Ware, The Orthodox Church, rev. ed. (New
York: Penguin, 1983), 26. This is a standard work on the Orthodox
church.
2 For a valuable treatment of this subject, see
Daniel B. Clendenin, Eastern Orthodox Church: A Western Perspective
(Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1994). Clendenin is an evangelical
who is a visiting professor of religion at Moscow State University.
3 Gillquist had been a leader in Campus Crusade
for Christ. His story may be found in his book, Becoming Orthodox: A
Journey to the Ancient Christian Faith (Brentwood, TN: Wolgemuth &
Hyatt, 1990).
4 R. W. Ruegsegger, "Schaeffer, Francis
August" in Daniel G. Reid, coordinating editor, Dictionary of
Christianity in America (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1990),
1050.
5 For an evangelical appraisal of Eastern
Orthodox motifs, see John Warwick Montgomery, Ecumenicity,
Evangelicals and Rome (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House,
1969), 25-32.
6 Andrew Walker, "In Defense of Ecumenical
Orthodoxy," Touchstone: A Journal of Ecumenical Orthodoxy,
Winter 1994, 13.
7 Harold 0. J. Brown, "Foreword," in
Norman L. Geisler and Ralph E. MacKenzie, Roman Catholics and
Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences (Grand Rapids: Baker Book
House, 1995). Also, for a brief treatment of Eastern Orthodoxy, see
the above volume, Appendix A: "The Churches of the East."
CRI, P.O. Box 7000, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
92688 Phone (949) 858-6100 and Fax (949) 858-6111
|